Scholar Structures is a set of writing frameworks developed by top scholars, backed by data analysis.

This is how we create it.

Step 1: Our top scholars from NUS Law and other universities write model 27/30 essays (marked by ex-MOE teachers).

Step 2: We break these model essays down into their fundamental components and map out all the methods commonly used to construct each component.

Step 3: We track which methods perform best under real exam conditions — using multi-year data from hundreds of students — and eliminate the methods that consistently underperform.

The result: a set of proprietary data insights on what actually works in the O-Level English exam.

We then convert these insights into a repeatable, objective system that any student can follow in the exam.

This means students finally get clear, actionable steps, instead of vague, outdated, and frankly useless writing methods.

If you’re still using rhetorical questions and statistics in your hook without the High Connotation Problem, if you’re writing points with no Thesis–Reason Matrix, if you’re elaborating without Insight + Process, or using examples without Contextual Evaluation, you’re doing it wrong.

Outdated methods simply aren’t designed for high-level exam application.

But with data-backed Scholar Structures, students stop taking the exam in “guess-mode”.

This is why our students don’t just score As — we produce cohort toppers and consistent 25, 26, and 27/30 essays, year after year.

*Classes cover all components except Listening Comprehension.